What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M14 review and vivo X200 Pro?
Compare Samsung Galaxy M14 review vs vivo X200 Pro
Compare devices
|
 |
|||
0 |
||||
| 0 | October 2024 | |||
| 0 | October 2024 | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | 5G | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | |||
| 0 | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | |||
| 0 | Dual SIM (2 physical SIM cards) | |||
| 0 | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | |||
| 0 | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | |||
| 0 | 6.78 inches | |||
| 0 | 1260 x 2800 pixels | |||
| 0 | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | Android 15 | |||
| 0 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | |||
| 0 | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | |||
| 0 | Immortalis-G925 | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | No | |||
| 0 | 256GB 12GB RAM or 512GB 16GB RAM or 1TB 16GB RAM | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | 50 MP (f/1.6)(Optical Image Stabilization) + 200 MP (3.7x optical zoom) + 50 MP (119˚) | |||
| 0 | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | |||
| 0 | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps | |||
| 0 | 32 MP (4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps) | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | Yes, with stereo speakers | |||
| 0 | ❌ | |||
| 0 | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | Yes | |||
| 0 | 5.4 | |||
| 0 | Yes | |||
| 0 | Yes | |||
| 0 | No | |||
| 0 | USB Type-C 3.2 | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, infrared port, satellite connectivity support (optional) | |||
| 0 | Fast charging 90W, Wireless charging 30W, Revserse charging | |||
0 |
||||
| 0 | 6000 mAh | |||